7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bosse v. Wolverine Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bosse v. Wolverine Insurance Anchor | green | “unqualified in its provision that conduct of the insured avoiding the policy as to him shall not avoid it as to those to whom he is under insured liability.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Wolbarst | green | “purpose of the new hampshire financial responsibility act was fundamentally to provide compensation for innocent persons that might be injured through faulty operation of motor vehicles.” | 3 |
| 3 | Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters & Trucki | green | “each motion, separately, in the light most favorably to the non-moving party, and draws all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” | 3 |
| 4 | Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Monadnock Regional School District | green | “there is no question that the delay in this case was substantial; we are not dealing here with a delay of a few weeks or months but one of almost two years.” | 3 |
| 5 | Dover Mills Partnership v. Commercial Union Insurance | green | “to demonstrate prejudice, . . . it must at the very least provide the court with facts showing prejudice and not merely surmise that it may be prejudiced because certain events may have occurred in the abstract during the period of delay.” | 3 |
| 6 | Wilson v. Progressive Northern Insurance | green | “the length of the delay in notification, . . . the reasons for the delay, and whether the delay resulted in prejudice to the insurer.” | 3 |
| 7 | Soraghan v. Mt. Cranmore Ski Resort, Inc. | green | “we first examine the language of the statute, and . . . when statutory language is ambiguous, we examine the statute's overall objective and presume that the legislature would not pass an act that would lead to an absurd or illogical result.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.