7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Dickson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Dickson Anchor | green | “do not doubt either the importance or the fallibility of eyewitness identifications.” | 3 |
| 2 | Garner v. People | green | “a small minority of courts have applied biggers to first-time in-court identifications since perry was decided” | 3 |
| 3 | Garner v. People | green | “and where nothing beyond the inherent suggestiveness of the ordinary courtroom setting made the in- court identification itself constitutionally suspect, due process does not require the trial court to assess the identification for reliability under biggers.” | 3 |
| 4 | Garner v. People | green | “pre-lineup or showup description and defendant's actual description,” | 3 |
| 5 | Kahler v. Kansas | green | “the question is whether a rule of criminal responsibility is so old and venerable-so entrenched in the central values of our legal system-as to prevent a state from ever choosing another.” | 3 |
| 6 | Robert Walden v. David Shinn | green | “if the police did not arrange suggestive circumstances leading the witness to identify a particular person as the perpetrator, the inquiry ends.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Carey | green | “is sufficient evidence to jury of any single fact” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.