3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Howard Nease v. Ford Motor Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howard Nease v. Ford Motor Company Anchor | green | “ensure that an expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand.” | 11 |
| 2 | Howard Nease v. Ford Motor Company | green | “ensure that the proffered expert opinion is 'based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge and not on belief or speculation, and inferences must be derived using scientific or other valid methods.” | 7 |
| 3 | Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC | green | “as the supreme court has repeatedly explained, daubert v. merrell dow pharmaceuticals, inc. offers district courts several guidepost factors that the court 'may consider' in assessing an expert's evidentiary reliability to the extent that the factors are relevant to the specific…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.