7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Western Watersheds Project v. Michael.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Western Watersheds Project v. Michael Anchor | green | “implemented a law banning travel to cuba for the purpose of writing about or filming what they observe.” | 3 |
| 2 | Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Wasden | green | “decisions about content, composition, lighting, volume, and angles.” | 3 |
| 3 | Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Wasden | green | “the conduct of an agricultural production facility's operations.” | 3 |
| 4 | Aptive Environmental v. Town of Castle Rock | green | “does not implicate the first amendment” | 3 |
| 5 | Kimberly Billups v. City of Charleston | green | “a law aimed at regulating businesses can be subject to first amendment scrutiny even though it does not directly regulate speech.” | 3 |
| 6 | imdb.com Inc v. Xavier Becerra | green | “private parties may freely bargain with each other to restrict their own speech” | 3 |
| 7 | Pratt v. United States | green | “the dicta in salerno does not accurately characterize the standard for deciding facial challenges.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.