7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ryan Miller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ryan Miller Anchor | green | “charges two or more distinct offenses within” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Ryan Miller | green | “comprise a continuing course of conduct that constitutes a single offense,” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Bryan Puckett | green | “make any effort at trial to prove that the loans were funded by the mortgage companies' parent corporations, which were banks.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Vahan Kelerchian | green | “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Vahan Kelerchian | green | “overturn a verdict only when the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a rea- sonable doubt.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Bouchard | green | “fraudulently obtained mortgage loan proceeds to purchase” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Bouchard | green | “in the (presumably rare) circum- stance in which the fraudster's intent to deceive extended be- yond the custodian to the bank itself ... would ... function as an extra-textual limit on the clause's compass.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.