7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Cremeans.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Cremeans Anchor | green | “has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a person who has not attained the age of 16 years . . .” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Mount | green | “of a kind or to a degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the risk assessment guidelines” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Mabee | green | “the defendant's unsatisfactory conduct during his incarceration was established by the case summary, which revealed his recent commission of a tier iii disciplinary violation.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Williams | green | “the defendant's unsatisfactory conduct during his incarceration was established by the case summary, which revealed that he recently committed a tier iii disciplinary violation.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Robinson | green | “the fact that the defendant's score on the static-99 classified him as a low risk to reoffend is not a circumstance which, standing alone, may be considered a mitigating factor.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Morgan | green | “the offenses overlap but the foreign offense also criminalizes conduct not covered under the new york offense, this court must review the conduct underlying the foreign conviction to determine if that conduct is, in fact, within the scope of the new york offense.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Restrepo | green | “the fact that the defendant's score on the static-99 classified him as a low risk to reoffend is not a circumstance which, standing alone, may be considered a mitigating factor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.