2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Blazina.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Blazina Anchor | green | “a defendant who makes no objection to the imposition of discretionary lfos at sentencing is not automatically entitled to review.” | 17 |
| 2 | State v. Bertrand | green | “the trial court's determination 'as to the defendant's resources and ability to pay is essentially factual and should be reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.