7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bochetto v. Piper Aircraft Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bochetto v. Piper Aircraft Co. Anchor | green | “foreign plaintiffs enjoy 'less deference' with regard to their choice of forum.” | 3 |
| 2 | McConnell, B. v. B. Braun Medical Inc. | green | “a court will ... not dismiss for forum non conveniens unless justice strongly militates in favor of relegating the plaintiff to another forum” | 3 |
| 3 | Failor, R. v. Fedex Ground Package | green | “determining forum non conveniens required the court to consider the relative convenience” | 3 |
| 4 | Failor, R. v. Fedex Ground Package | green | “error of law if the trial court makes an analysis based on the inconvenience of one county to another state because a case's lack of connection to one county does not justify dismissal from the entire state” | 3 |
| 5 | Failor, R. v. Fedex Ground Package | green | “failed to provide sufficient evidence of public factors to support overriding the duxbury's choice of forum.” | 3 |
| 6 | Hurt, J. v. Penn Central Corporation | green | “the doctrine of forum non conveniens provides the court with a means of looking beyond technical considerations such as jurisdiction and venue to determine whether litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum would serve the interests of justice under the particular circumstances.” | 3 |
| 7 | Burnett, R. v. Penn Central Corp. | green | “this factor alone should not be viewed as giving trial courts carte blanche authority to transfer any case which may be as conveniently litigated elsewhere” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.