9 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 143 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Sabre.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Sabre Anchor | green | “the decision of the board was logically and rationally supported by the evidence, and was not unreasonable, arbitrary, illegal or an abuse of the board's discretion.” | 27 |
| 2 | Cervantes v. Administrator | green | “the purpose of the unemployment compensation act is to provide income for the worker earning nothing because he is out of work through no fault or act of his own. . . .” | 25 |
| 3 | Burnham v. Administrator | green | “as a general rule, the application of statutory criteria to determine a claimant's eligibility for unemployment compensation under general statutes 31-235 and 31-236 involves mixed questions of fact and law in which the expertise of the administrative agency is highly relevant.” | 22 |
| 4 | Calnan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act | green | “corrections by the court of the board's finding will only be made upon the refusal to find a material fact which was an admitted or undisputed fact, upon the finding of a fact in language of doubtful meaning so that its real significance may not clearly appear, or upon the findi…” | 17 |
| 5 | Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act | green | “finkenstein v. administrator, unemployment compensation act, 192 conn. 104 , 112 , 470 a.2d 1196 (1984).” | 16 |
| 6 | Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act | green | “finkenstein v. administrator, 192 conn. 104 , 112 , 470 a.2d 1196 (1984).” | 14 |
| 7 | Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act | green | “finkenstein v. administrator , 192 conn. 104 , 112 , 470 a.2d 1196 (1984).” | 13 |
| 8 | Calnan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act | green | “a necessary prerequisite to a challenge to the board's decision.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.