7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Effland v. People.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effland v. People Anchor | green | “officers were fully aware of his mental condition and the failed suicide attempt at the time of the interrogation” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Eberle | green | “moreover, the expert's statement that the infant died from 'homicidal' suffocation improperly states a conclusion regarding defendant's intent.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Chambers | green | “believing the first confession admissible, the strong probability is that the defendant concluded a repetition could make the case no worse, and the last confession was made under the influence of the preceding one.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Lewis | green | “waited to advise the defendant of her miranda warnings until she essentially had divulged her entire involvement” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Dao Xiong | green | “assisted the jury's understanding of the medical evidence offered at trial by explaining that the autopsy results were consistent with homicide” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Dao Xiong | green | “establishing that expert testimony regarding the victim's manner of death can be helpful to the jury” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Dao Xiong | green | “examination of the victim's body.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.