7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Tarver.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Tarver Anchor | green | “probative and explanatory value of the molineux evidence clearly outweighed the potential prejudice to defendant, particularly since the later incident can readily be viewed as a continuation of the” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Antegua | green | “inextricably interwoven with directly related material in the sense that it is explanatory of the acts done” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Tillman | neutral | “the court was in the best position to observe the demeanor of the prospective juror and the prosecutor, and its determination that the prosecutor's reasons for exercising peremptory challenges with respect to the . . . prospective juror were race-neutral and not pretextual is en…” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Walton | green | “unjustified . . . and . . . did not require substitution” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Smith | green | “considering the defense position that defendant did not intend to steal property, we conclude that the molineux evidence fell within recognized exceptions and its probative value to the people's case outweighed its prejudice to defendant” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Radoncic | green | “provide background information as to how and why the police pursued and confronted defendant” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Santiago | green | “failed to articulate to the court any reason why he believed that the prosecutor's explanations were pretextual” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.