6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Harris.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Harris Anchor | green | “was separate and distinct from” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Mobley | green | “the jury's resolution of credibility and identification issues is entitled to great weight” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Watkins | green | “although the court should have expressly denied defendant's motion on the record, we conclude that the record is sufficient to establish conclusively that the motion was implicitly denied” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Windrum | green | “the excited utterances of a victim identifying the shooter constitute direct evidence of guilt” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Hobart | green | “inquired into the nature of the disagreement and its potential for resolution” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.