4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lamorte Burns & Co., Inc. v. Walters.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamorte Burns & Co., Inc. v. Walters Anchor | green | “to prove its claim, plaintiff must show that it had a reasonable expectation of economic advantage that was lost as a direct result of defendants' malicious interference, and that it suffered losses thereby.” | 4 |
| 2 | R. M. Harrison Mechanical Corp. v. Decker Industries, Inc. | green | “the circumstances of the acceptance or retention of the benefit must render it inequitable for the defendant not to compensate the plaintiff.” | 4 |
| 3 | Williamson Oil Company, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA | green | “as evidenced by the repeated, synchronous pricing decisions that occurred within the tobacco industry between 1993 and 2000, appellees plainly priced their products in parallel.” | 3 |
| 4 | Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute | green | “the use of the multiple basing point delivered price system by the cement producers has been coincident with a situation whereby for many years, with rare exceptions, cement has been offered for sale in every given locality at identical prices and terms by all producers.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.