3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sandra Gilbert v. Patrick Donahoe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sandra Gilbert v. Patrick Donahoe Anchor | green | “it appears certain that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle plaintiff to relief.” | 10 |
| 2 | Cobb v. Central States, Southwest & Southeast Areas Pension Fund | green | “whether a party has proper standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction” | 6 |
| 3 | De Leon v. Perry | green | “federal courts have no jurisdiction unless a case or controversy is presented by a party with standing to litigate.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.