2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Keating v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keating v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Anchor | green | “considered the factors relevant to its decision and articulated a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” | 17 |
| 2 | Franks v. Salazar | green | “necessary to ensure the survival or recovery” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.