5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and Welfare.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and Welfare Anchor | green | “the cases demonstrate that, consistent with the legislative purpose, courts have mandated that leniency be shown in establishing the claimant's disability, and that the secretary's responsibility to rebut it be strictly construed.” | 6 |
| 2 | Friedberg v. Schweiker | green | “however, even if the secretary's factual findings are supported by substantial evidence, a court may review whether the secretary, in making his findings, applied the correct legal standards to the facts presented.” | 6 |
| 3 | James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America | green | “these proceedings are extremely important to the claimants, who are in real need in most instances and who claim not charity but that which is rightfully due as provided for in chapter 7, subchapter ii, of the social security act.” | 4 |
| 4 | Albury v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “our primary concern has always been the ability to conduct meaningful judicial review.” | 2 |
| 5 | Albury v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “ur primary concern has always been the ability to conduct meaningful judicial review.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.