2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee Anchor | green | “the mere existence of factual issues - where those issues are not material to the claims before the court - will not suffice to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” | 10 |
| 2 | Frouge Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank (Nat. Ass'n) | green | “one of the moving parties is entitled to judgment as a matter of law upon facts that are not genuinely disputed.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.