3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Harman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Harman Anchor | green | “may affirm, modify, or reverse a bankruptcy court's judgment, order, or decree or remand with instructions for further proceedings.” | 8 |
| 2 | Nasser Ali Farouki v. Emirates Bank International, Limited, and Ron Cerino Enterprise Management, Incorporated | green | “due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the bankruptcy court to judge the credibility of witnesses.” | 8 |
| 3 | Behrmann v. National Heritage Foundation, Inc. | green | “the bankruptcy court's failure to make sufficient factual findings in support of its legal conclusions does not allow for meaningful appellate review.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.