6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Dallas County Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Dallas County Commission Anchor | green | “the at-large election of the probate judge is permissible under the voting rights act with respect to the judicial aspects of that office.” | 4 |
| 2 | Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Siegelman | green | “the full authority of that office is exercised exclusively by one individual,” | 4 |
| 3 | Haith v. Martin | green | “the act applies to all voting without any limitation as to who, or what, is the object of the vote.” | 3 |
| 4 | Haith v. Martin | green | “designated seats in multi-member districts, ... they are subject to section 5 preclearance requirements.” | 3 |
| 5 | Haith v. Martin | green | “designated seats in multi-member districts.” | 3 |
| 6 | Martin v. Allain | green | “the act applies to all voting without any limitation as to who, or what, is the object of the vote.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.