3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard M. Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard M. Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Anchor | green | “(1) that he has been pursuing his rights diligently, and (2) that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way and prevented timely filing.” | 8 |
| 2 | Roger Justice v. United States | green | “an extraordinary remedy which should be extended only sparingly.” | 6 |
| 3 | Roger Justice v. United States | green | “the supreme court has made clear that tolling is an extraordinary remedy which should be extended only sparingly.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.