3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wing v. Asarco Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wing v. Asarco Incorporated Anchor | green | “a plain error, discretion exercised to an end not justified by the evidence, a judgment that is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts as are found.” | 12 |
| 2 | Cairns v. Franklin Mint Company | green | “either groundless, unreasonable, vexatious or pursued in bad faith.” | 4 |
| 3 | Thane International, Inc. v. Trek Bicycle Corporation | green | “the dual purposes of infringement law: ensuring that owners of trademarks can benefit from the goodwill associated with their marks and that consumers can distinguish among competing producers.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.