4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Curtis Evans.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Curtis Evans Anchor | green | “affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Curtis Evans | green | “fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. David Lee Oliver | green | “we would be usurping the discretionary power granted to the district courts by booker if we were to assume that the district court would have given defendant the same sentence post-booker.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Alex Vazquez | green | “judge, rather than the jury, determined drug quantity and then sentenced vasquez to . . . a term in excess of his . . . statutory maximum.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.