2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Mack Allen Richardson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Mack Allen Richardson Anchor | green | “proof that possession of contraband is knowing will usually depend on inference and circumstantial evidence” | 7 |
| 2 | Grant v. State | green | “proof that possession of contraband is knowing will usually depend on inference and circumstantial evidence” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.