2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rosenblum v. Travelbyus.Com Limited.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosenblum v. Travelbyus.Com Limited Anchor | green | “as a general rule, on a rule 12(b)(6) motion, the court may consider only the plaintiff's complaint.” | 11 |
| 2 | Joseph H. Levenstein v. Bernard Salafsky, Patricia A. Gill, and David C. Broski, in Their Individual Capacities | green | “is not intended to grant litigants license to ignore the distinction between motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.