4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bossier Chrysler-Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bossier Chrysler-Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg Anchor | green | “as consistent with innocent activity as with criminal activity” | 11 |
| 2 | Foster v. State | green | “as consistent with innocent activity as with criminal activity” | 3 |
| 3 | Foster v. State | green | “effectively prevented appellant from moving.” | 3 |
| 4 | Foster v. State | green | “intoxication cannot be inferred from the lurching movements alone, and while the lurching movements may be more suggestive of intoxication when combined with the location and time of night, the combined weight of these circumstances is not so much greater than the aggregation of…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.