5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Ortiz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Ortiz Anchor | green | “one aggravating factor is sufficient to support the imposition of an upper term.” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Kelley | green | “the court is presumed to have considered all relevant factors unless the record affirmatively shows the contrary.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Peterson | green | “we cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on issues of credibility.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Smith | green | “because adequate reasons for imposing full consecutive sentences on counts v and vi existed in abundance, the error in failing to state those reasons does not require a remand for resentencing” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Shazier | green | “i.e., patiently cultivating and manipulating her to achieve his purposes.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.