6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cavin v. Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavin v. Brown Anchor | green | “general damages awarded on a fraud claim may cover a broader range of damages than those awarded on contract claims.” | 5 |
| 2 | Donchi, Inc. v. ROBDOL, LLC | green | “in cases where the allegedly defrauded party affirms a contract which contains a merger clause or disclaimer provision and retains the benefits, he is estopped from asserting that he relied upon the other party's misrepresentation and his action for fraud must fail.” | 3 |
| 3 | Browning v. Stocks | green | “in the absence of any claim that the fraud arose from representations which were part of the sales contract, the appellees' suit for damages was necessarily based on the claim that the appellant fraudulently induced them to enter into the sales contract by actively or passively …” | 3 |
| 4 | Lee v. Georgia Power Co. | green | “was not in the language of the instruction, but in the fact that it was given at all,” | 3 |
| 5 | Camaron v. State | green | “sufficiently ambiguous, for purposes of this motion, so that a jury, under proper instruction, should decide whether 'fixtures' refers only to trade fixtures or includes permanent improvements to the property.” | 3 |
| 6 | Conway v. Romarion | green | “a merger clause does not prevent a claim of fraud arising from representations in the contract itself.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.