5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Booth v. Booth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Booth v. Booth Anchor | green | “when waste has occurred, the court must include the wasted assets as marital property and must consider the waste as a factor in determining the monetary award.” | 6 |
| 2 | Ross v. Craw | green | “a contract is not deemed ambiguous merely because the parties disagree as to the meaning of the language they used to express their agreement.” | 5 |
| 3 | Robinette v. Robinette | green | “unless it appears from the record that the chancellor has abused his discretion, that he has not considered or has misapplied one of the statutory mandates, or that the evidence fails to support the findings of fact underlying his resolution of the conflict in the equities,” | 3 |
| 4 | Phipps v. Storey | green | “where the annual rental is not agreed upon and the contract does not otherwise provide a manner for its definite determination, the contract does not meet this test of certainty.” | 3 |
| 5 | Tuley v. Barton | green | “all come back either to him in the event of divorce or come back to his son and grandchildren after both of us were dead,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.