3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System Anchor | green | “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts, consistent with the complaint, which would entitle the plaintiff to relief.” | 14 |
| 2 | Washington Federation of State Employees v. State | green | “a contract is a promise or set of promises for the breach of which gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty.” | 3 |
| 3 | Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services | green | “may consider hypothetical facts not included in the record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.