4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bell v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bell v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “must apply kre 404(b) cautiously, with an eye towards eliminating evidence which is relevant only as proof of an accused's propensity to commit a certain type of crime.” | 9 |
| 2 | Davis v. Commonwealth | green | “the jury could reasonably conclude that the acts occurred and that the defendant was the actor.” | 4 |
| 3 | Bell v. Commonwealth | green | “so inextricably intertwined with other evidence essential to the case that separation of the two (2) could not be accomplished without serious adverse effect on the offering party.” | 4 |
| 4 | Mason v. Commonwealth | green | “may be deemed harmless if the reviewing court can say with fair assurance that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.