5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc. Anchor | green | “wide-spread state restrictions on nonconsensual blood testing provide further support for our recognition that compelled blood draws implicate a significant privacy interest.” | 5 |
| 2 | Thomas v. State | green | “consider all evidence which the jury was permitted, whether rightly or wrongly, to consider.” | 4 |
| 3 | Thomas v. State | green | “reviewing court must consider all evidence which the jury was permitted, whether rightly or wrongly, to consider.” | 4 |
| 4 | Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc. | green | “in those drunk-driving investigations where police officers can reasonably obtain a warrant before a blood sample can be drawn without significantly undermining the efficacy of the search, the fourth amendment mandates that they do so.” | 4 |
| 5 | Dixon v. State | green | “to preserve error for appellate review, the complaining party must make a timely, specific objection and obtain a ruling on the objection," and "the compliant on appeal must comport with the objection at trial.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.