5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 139 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dorchester Financial Securities, Inc. v. Banco BRJ, S.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dorchester Financial Securities, Inc. v. Banco BRJ, S.A. Anchor | green | “varies depending on the procedural posture of the litigation.” | 60 |
| 2 | In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Asat Trust Reg.) | green | “must include an averment of facts that, if credited by the ultimate trier of fact, would suffice to establish jurisdiction over the defendant.” | 29 |
| 3 | Seetransport Wiking Trader Schiffarhtsgesellschaft Mbh & Co., Kommanditgesellschaft v. Navimpex Centrala Navala and Uzinexportimport | green | “all factual disputes are resolved in the plaintiff's favor, and the plaintiff's prima facie showing is sufficient notwithstanding the contrary presentation by the moving party.” | 22 |
| 4 | Eades v. Kennedy, PC Law Offices | green | “in order to survive a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, a plaintiff must make a prima facie showing that jurisdiction exists.” | 22 |
| 5 | Seetransport Wiking Trader Schiffarhtsgesellschaft Mbh & Co., Kommanditgesellschaft v. Navimpex Centrala Navala and Uzinexportimport | green | “if the parties present conflicting affidavits, all factual disputes are resolved in the plaintiff's favor, and the plaintiff's prima facie showing is sufficient notwithstanding the contrary presentation by the moving party.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.