3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from CENTENNIAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. Guthrie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CENTENNIAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. Guthrie Anchor | green | “it is uneconomical for an appellate court to review facts on an appeal following a rule 54(b) certification that it is likely to be required to consider again when another appeal is brought after the trial court renders its decision on the remaining claims or as to the remaining…” | 14 |
| 2 | Scrushy v. Tucker | green | “whether there was "no just reason for delay" is an inquiry committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, as to that issue, we must determine whether the trial court exceeded its discretion.” | 4 |
| 3 | Schlarb v. Lee | green | “are so closely intertwined that separate adjudication would pose an unreasonable risk of inconsistent results.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.