3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther Anchor | green | “here, testimony that the liquid was dirty and scuffed and had several tracks running through it was, in our opinion, adequate to impute constructive notice of the hazardous condition to the store manager.” | 6 |
| 2 | Woods v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. | green | “testimony of dirt, scuffing, or tracks in a substance generates sufficient inferences of constructive notice.” | 4 |
| 3 | Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther | green | “estimony that the liquid was dirty and scuffed and had several tracks running through it was, in our opinion, adequate to impute constructive notice of the hazardous condition to the store manager.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.