5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Landers v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Landers v. State Anchor | green | “outside the zone of reasonable disagreement.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lawton v. State | green | “is whether the declarant was still dominated by the emotions, excitement, fear, or pain of the event.” | 5 |
| 3 | Landers v. State | green | “a substantially related matter” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Tippecanoe County Court | green | “that even though the defendant's prior convictions were a matter of public record, it could not be said” | 3 |
| 5 | Landers v. State | green | “almost total deference to a trial court's determination of the historical facts that the record supports especially when the trial court's fact findings are based on an evaluation of credibility and demeanor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.