3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from R.W. Dunteman Co. v. C/G Enterprises Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R.W. Dunteman Co. v. C/G Enterprises Inc. Anchor | green | “an order is final and appealable if it terminates the litigation between the parties on the merits or disposes of the rights of the parties, either on the entire controversy or a separate part thereof.” | 13 |
| 2 | In Re DDH | green | “a permanency goal does not finally determine a right or status of a party but instead looks at the anticipated future status of the child.” | 4 |
| 3 | R.W. Dunteman Co. v. C/G Enterprises Inc. | green | “terminates the litigation between the parties on the merits or disposes of the rights of the parties, either on the entire controversy or a separate part thereof.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.