4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. Anchor | green | “analysis of these factors is qualitative, not merely quantitative.” | 5 |
| 2 | Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. | green | “courts have determined that litigation should take place in the federal judicial district or division with the closest relationship to the operative events.” | 5 |
| 3 | Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. | green | “the plaintiff's choice of forum generally is entitled to respect and deference and should rarely be disturbed.” | 5 |
| 4 | Parham v. Weave Corp. | green | “the deference given to the plaintiff's choice is proportionate to the relation between the forum and the cause of action.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.