5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Castaic Partners II, LLC v. Daca-Castaic, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Castaic Partners II, LLC v. Daca-Castaic, LLC Anchor | green | “confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.” | 4 |
| 2 | Bate Land Co. v. Bate Land & Timber LLC (In Re Bate Land & Timber LLC) | green | “weighing the competing evidence presented by the parties and arriving at a conclusion is exactly the task that the bankruptcy court must carry out as a fact-finder.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Willie McCall | green | “after presiding over lengthy, involved litigation, a district court will likely have useful knowledge that would be difficult for a new judge to acquire.” | 4 |
| 4 | Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brock | green | “an indorsement made in blank . . . is payable to bearer and may be negotiated by transfer of possession alone.” | 4 |
| 5 | Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brock | green | “the person in possession of a note, either specially indorsed to that person or indorsed in blank, is a holder entitled generally to enforce that note.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.