5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A. Anchor | green | “personal jurisdiction is readily waivable.” | 8 |
| 2 | Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc. | green | “in determining the law of any jurisdiction . . . thereof outside this commonwealth, the tribunal may consider any ____________________________________________ 2 there is no dispute that the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims of the pennsylvania plaintiff…” | 3 |
| 3 | Coxall v. Clover Commercial Corp. | green | “regardless of any injury that may have resulted.” | 3 |
| 4 | Coxall v. Clover Commercial Corp. | green | “provides a minimum, statutory, damage recovery for a debtor . . . in a consumer-goods transaction,4 and it is designed to ensure that every noncompliance with the requirements of part 6 in a consumer-goods transaction results in liability, regardless of any injury that may have …” | 3 |
| 5 | Turnpaugh Chiropractic Health v. Erie Ins. Exch. | green | “although we are not bound by decisions from . . . courts in other jurisdictions, we may use them for guidance to the degree we find them useful, persuasive, and . . . not incompatible with pennsylvania law” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.