6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Grimm v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grimm v. State Anchor | green | “generally, an increase in the rent alone will not be sufficient to establish a ' colorable claim of fraud , and a mere allegation of fraud alone, without more, will not be sufficient to pierce the lookback period (emphasis added).” | 5 |
| 2 | Matter of AEJ 534 E. 88th, LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal | green | “critically, there is a distinction between an overcharge claim and a challenge to the deregulated status of an apartment . . . .” | 3 |
| 3 | Lavanant v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal | green | “willfulness is intentionally doing an act and knowing that the act is being done (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).” | 3 |
| 4 | New York University v. Farkas | green | “to conduct discovery in a summary proceeding, the court must find,” | 3 |
| 5 | 41-47 Nick LLC v. Odumosu | green | “(l 2023 ch 760, part b, 2 (b), as amended by l 2024, ch 95, 4.) the chapter amendments” | 3 |
| 6 | 1532-1609 Ocean Ave LLC v. Hertzan | neutral | “most recent reliable annual registration statement” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.