2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Deborah Morgan v. Andrew Saul.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deborah Morgan v. Andrew Saul Anchor | green | “this is not a high threshold; it requires only such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 10 |
| 2 | Todd Hess v. Martin J. O'Malley | green | “adequate discussion of the issues and evidence involved in the claim.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.