4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Coastal Fuels Marketing, Inc. v. Florida Express Shipping Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coastal Fuels Marketing, Inc. v. Florida Express Shipping Co. Anchor | green | “when neither statutory nor judicially created maritime principles provide an answer to a specific legal question, courts may apply state law provided that the application of state law does not frustrate national interests in having uniformity in admiralty law.” | 8 |
| 2 | Coastal Fuels Marketing, Inc. v. Florida Express Shipping Co. | green | “but, when neither statutory nor judicially created maritime principles provide an answer to a specific legal question, courts may apply state law provided that the application of state law does not frustrate national interests in having uniformity in admiralty law.” | 4 |
| 3 | Coastal Fuels Marketing, Inc. v. Florida Express Shipping Co. | green | “frustrate national interests in having uniformity in admiralty law.” | 4 |
| 4 | Tancredi v. Dive Makai Charters | green | “negligent dive planning and supervision and the actions of the dive master in taking tancredi to unsafe levels.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.