6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Adams v. Baker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adams v. Baker Anchor | green | “implies the use of a reasonable person standard.” | 5 |
| 2 | Seemab Fatima Shah Khurram Aijaz v. Attorney General of the United States | green | “the bia directs us to the opinion and decision of the ij who originally assessed the application.” | 4 |
| 3 | Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration v. National Cement Co. of California, Inc. | green | “is a danger to the security of the united states.” | 3 |
| 4 | Apolinar Perafan Saldarriaga Luz Velasquez Carmona Adrianna Menesses Velasquez Mauricio Perafan Velasquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General | green | “the petitioner had no reason or basis for appealing the ij's decision in his favor” | 3 |
| 5 | Bacon v. Rives | green | “danger to the security of new zealand” | 2 |
| 6 | A-H | green | “if there is information that would permit a reasonable person to believe that the alien may pose a danger to the national security.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.