4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from General Electric Capital Corp. v. New York State Division of Tax Appeals.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General Electric Capital Corp. v. New York State Division of Tax Appeals Anchor | green | “in so doing, an agency can adopt regulations that go beyond the text of that legislation, provided they are not inconsistent with the statutory language or its underlying purposes” | 10 |
| 2 | Califano v. Torres | green | “insures new residents the same right to vital government benefits and privileges in the social services district to which they migrate as are enjoyed by other residents” | 3 |
| 3 | McBride-Head v. Head | green | “just; consistent with principles of justice and right” | 3 |
| 4 | Alexander v. New York Central Mutual | neutral | “dismissing the second amended complaint rather than declaring the rights of the parties” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.