7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 136 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Guang Run Yu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guang Run Yu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States Anchor | green | “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 33 |
| 2 | Guang Run Yu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States | green | “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 33 |
| 3 | Sekou Sylla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “if discrepancies cannot be viewed as attempts by the applicant to enhance his claims of persecution, they have no bearing on credibility.” | 22 |
| 4 | Sekou Sylla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “credibility determinations are considered findings of fact, and are reviewed under the substantial evidence standard.” | 18 |
| 5 | Guang Run Yu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States | green | “findings of fact are 'conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 14 |
| 6 | Sekou Sylla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “an adverse credibility finding must be based on issues that go to the heart of the applicant's claim.” | 9 |
| 7 | Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “we review the immigration judge's decision as the final agency decision.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.