Topic: to assess whether an individual was denied procedural due p… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #21323

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Montgomery v. City of Ardmore.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Montgomery v. City of Ardmore Anchor
ca10 · 2004
green “to assess whether an individual was denied procedural due process, courts must engage in a two-step inquiry: (1) did the individual possess a protected interest such that the due process protections were applicable; and, if so, then (2) was the individual afforded an appropriate…” 8
2 Citizens for Peace in Space v. City of Colorado Springs
ca10 · 2007
green “an obligation to make an independent examination of the whole record in order to make sure that the judgment does not constitute a forbidden intrusion on the field of free expression.” 5
3 West v. Grand County
ca10 · 1992
green “a full evidentiary hearing is not required prior to an adverse employment action.” 3
4 Anglemyer v. Hamilton County Hospital
ca10 · 1995
green “state statutes, regulations, municipal ordinances, university rules, and even express or implied contracts.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check