4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Swineford v. Snyder County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Swineford v. Snyder County Anchor | green | “a jury verdict will not be overturned unless the record is critically deficient of that quantum of evidence from which a jury could have rationally reached its verdict.” | 7 |
| 2 | Smithkline Corporation v. Eli Lilly and Company | green | “although eligibility for the 3 bonus rebate was based on the purchase of specified quantities of any three of lilly's cephalosporins, in reality it meant the combined purchases of kefzol and the leading sellers, keflin and keflex.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. | green | “a case in which a monopolist (1) faces competition on only part of a complementary group of products, (2) offers the products both as a package and individually, and (3) effectively forces its competitors to absorb the differential between the bundled and unbundled prices of the…” | 4 |
| 4 | Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. | green | “the antitrust laws were not intended, and may not be used, to require businesses to price their products at unreasonably high prices (which penalize the consumer) so that less efficient competitors can stay in business.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.