4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from TITUS, Thomas E., Appellant, v. MERCEDES BENZ OF NORTH AMERICA.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TITUS, Thomas E., Appellant, v. MERCEDES BENZ OF NORTH AMERICA Anchor | green | “broad discretion should be accorded district courts in the management of their calendars.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Wecht | green | “it is important to note that district courts have wide discretion in the management of their cases.” | 6 |
| 3 | Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler Ag | green | “although a finding of bad faith is generally required for a court to impose sanctions pursuant to its inherent authority, no express requirement of intent or negligence exists in the language of rule 16(f).” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Wecht | green | “district courts have wide discretion in the management of their cases.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.