4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Caspari v. Bohlen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caspari v. Bohlen Anchor | green | “n the teague analysis the reasonable views of state courts are entitled to consideration along with those of federal courts.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Rondell Herbert Garrison | green | “we . . . agree with the ninth circuit that the important rights guaranteed by batson deserve the full protection of the adversarial process except where compelling reasons requiring secrecy are shown.” | 3 |
| 3 | Donald O. Coe v. Otis Thurman, Warden | green | “where a state guarantees the right to a direct appeal, as california does, the state is required to make that appeal satisfy the due process clause.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Ayala | green | “thus, even if there was federal error, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.