5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Viollca Brucaj v. John D. Ashcroft.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Viollca Brucaj v. John D. Ashcroft Anchor | green | “the record compels a contrary result.” | 5 |
| 2 | Djillali Ahmed v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States | green | “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” | 4 |
| 3 | Viollca Brucaj v. John D. Ashcroft | green | “if the record compels a contrary result.” | 4 |
| 4 | George Malcom Anthony Rashiah, Salomi Hiranthie Anthony Rashiah, and Anne Oshani Anthony Rashiah v. John D. Ashcroft | green | “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person . . . with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.” | 3 |
| 5 | Zigmey Lhanzom v. Alberto R. Gonzales | green | “gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights within the country of removal,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.